| MudmotorTalk.com http://mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/ |
|
| Former AG Barr said Trump's Election Fraud was "Bullshit" http://mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=75691 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | dguidry [ Tue Jun 29, 2021 10:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Former AG Barr said Trump's Election Fraud was "Bullshit" |
The cards are falling fellas. Can't believe most of you subscribed to Trump's bullshit. You should be ashamed of yourselves for being so ignorant. |
|
| Author: | huck Finn [ Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Former AG Barr said Trump's Election Fraud was "Bullshit |
" De-lu-sion-al. " * Characterized by holding idiosyncratic beliefs or impressions that are contradicted by reality or rational argument...., Typically a symptom of Mental Disorder. * based on having Faulty Judgment. The above Poster should change his Avatar Name, I have left you an example. Do Not be distracted to easily, Arizona Audit Results coming out soon, You do Know the difference between an actual Audit and a Recount. Stand By. H Finn |
|
| Author: | BlueShamu [ Wed Jun 30, 2021 8:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Former AG Barr said Trump's Election Fraud was "Bullshit |
Is this a thread about mental disorders? Can I go next? The one I like to reference is “Histrionic Personality Disorder. Individuals with Histrionic Personality Disorder exhibit excessive emotionalism--a tendency to regard things in an emotional manner--and are attention seekers. People with this disorder are uncomfortable or feel unappreciated when they are not the center of attention. Behaviors may include constant seeking of approval or attention, self-dramatization, theatricality, and striking self-centeredness or sexual seductiveness in inappropriate situations, including social, occupational and professional relationships beyond what is appropriate for the social context. They may be lively and dramatic and initially charm new acquaintances by their enthusiasm, apparent openness, or flirtatiousness. They commandeer the role of "the life of the party". Personal interests and conversation will be self-focused. They use physical appearance to draw attention to themselves. Emotional expression may be shallow and rapidly shifting. Their style of speech is excessively impressionistic and lacking in detail. They may do well with jobs that value and require imagination and creativity but will probably have difficulty with tasks that demand logical or analytical thinking. The disorder occurs more frequently in women though that may be because it is more often diagnosed in women than men. If you or somebody you know suffers from this personality disorder, seek professional therapy. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
| Author: | dguidry [ Thu Jul 01, 2021 5:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Former AG Barr said Trump's Election Fraud was "Bullshit |
If you are incapable of debate, lack intelligence to do so, you revert to name calling. So sad for you, but typical of Trumpian idealogues. |
|
| Author: | BlueShamu [ Thu Jul 01, 2021 10:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Former AG Barr said Trump's Election Fraud was "Bullshit |
The U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) on Thursday upheld the Arizona statute that bans ballot harvesting and a policy that throws out votes cast by persons in precincts in which they do not reside. Justice Alito wrote for the majority in a 6 to 3 decision that neither Arizona’s HB 2023 banning ballot harvesting nor the policy outlawing out-of-precinct voting violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act which bans racial discrimination. Alito was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, Barrett, and Kavanaugh. Justice Kagan wrote the dissent, joined by Justices Breyer and Sotomayor. “In these cases, we are called upon for the first time to apply Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act to regulations that govern how ballots are collected and counted. Arizona law generally makes it easy to vote. All voters may vote by mail or in person for nearly a month before election day, but Arizona imposes two restrictions that are claimed to be unlawful,” Alito wrote in his majority opinion. First, in some counties, voters who choose to cast a ballot in person or on election day must vote in their own precincts or else their ballots will not be counted. Second, mail-in ballots cannot be collected by anyone other than an election official, a mail carrier, or a voter’s family member, household member, or caregiver,” Alito continued: The regulations at issue in this suit govern precinct-based election day voting and early mail in voting. Voters who choose to vote in person on election day in a county that uses the precinct system must vote in their assigned precincts. For those who choose to vote early by mail, Arizona has long required that “[o]nly the elector may be in possession of that elector’s early ballot.” In 2016, the state legislature enacted House Bill 2023 (HB 2023), which makes it a crime for any person other than a postal worker, an elections official, or a voter’s caregiver, family member, or household member to knowingly collect an early ballot –either before or after it has been completed. Having describe the issues at the core of the case, Alito continued. “One strong and entirely legitimate state interest is the prevention of fraud. Fraud can affect the outcome of a close election, and fraudulent votes dilute the right of citizens to cast ballots that carry appropriate weight,” Alito wrote: Fraud can also undermine public confidence in the fairness of elections and the perceived legitimacy of the announced outcome. Ensuring that every vote is cast freely, without intimidation or undue influence is also a valid and important state interest. This interest helped to spur the adoption of what soon became standard practice in this country and other democratic nations the world round: the use of private voting booths. Alito then addressed the key argument made against the Arizona election practices, that they violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and were therefore racially discriminatory. “Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act provides vital protection against discriminatory voting rules, and no one suggests that discrimination in voting has been extirpated, or that the threat has been eliminated. But Section 2 does not deprive the States of their authority to establish non-discriminatory voting rules, and that is precisely what the dissent’s radical interpretation would mean in practice,” Alito wrote. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
| Author: | dguidry [ Fri Jul 02, 2021 5:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Former AG Barr said Trump's Election Fraud was "Bullshit |
Yes, Jim Crow and Uncle Tom still alive and well. |
|
| Author: | Glades Ranger [ Sat Jul 03, 2021 5:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Former AG Barr said Trump's Election Fraud was "Bullshit |
Whiskey, whisky, or bourbon? Prince Prospero, the walls are breached! |
|
| Author: | huck Finn [ Tue Jul 06, 2021 8:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Former AG Barr said Trump's Election Fraud was "Bullshit |
Vi- ti- ate- (verb) : to make ineffective, Faulty . :blemish , darken , mar, poison, spoil, stain, or tarnish. " Fraud Vitiates Everything" .. U.S Supreme Court , Untied States VS> Throckmorton . Look it up . H Finn |
|
| Author: | dguidry [ Tue Jul 06, 2021 5:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Former AG Barr said Trump's Election Fraud was "Bullshit |
| Author: | huck Finn [ Wed Jul 07, 2021 7:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Former AG Barr said Trump's Election Fraud was "Bullshit |
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|