|
FAQ
• Login
|
|
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 3:07 pm
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 8 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
Ari.P
MMT Member
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:39 am Posts: 41 Location: Nederland, TX
|
 1848 vs 1754
A few years back I bought a new GT rig, 1854 powered by a 35. Really liked the boat. I fished out of it comfortably, but it was slow when loaded. I started hunting timber, and still do 12-15 times a year. Wrecked that boat, replaced it with an 1846 SouthFork mud hull powered by a 37EFI GT. MAN! That thing scoots. I like the speed I gained, but didn't like how unsteady it was. It's an .080 boat and didn't last long. I had to idle a cypress slough to get to a piece of woods we were hunting, and took it very easy going over the stumps. It put hooks in the bottom like I've never seen before. Totaled the boat. So....I'm back to buying a new hull. Pretty set on another Gator Tail.9 months out of the year I'm bowfishing and fishing, the rest chasing ducks. Here's the dilemma...in a few years this won't be my primary fishing rig, it will be used mostly for bowfishing and duckhunting. I figure if I can bowfish out of it comfortably, I should be able to fish no problem. Initially my plans were to order a new boat from GatorTail...an 1848 extreme and have a removable bowfishing deck built. Now, I'm considering the 48 may be too narrow for a few big boys up on it. 1754x1848 powered by a 37 EFI. Any firsthand experience will be great!
|
Mon Jan 16, 2017 9:14 pm |
|
 |
Brokeknee
MMT Pro Member
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 2:32 pm Posts: 261
|
 Re: 1848 vs 1754
I have a 17x48. I'm 6'1 300# and got a friend that is the same size. There's no way I would stand on the front with him. Ive been in a 17x54 and it seemed significantly more stable. Just my opinion though.
|
Tue Jan 17, 2017 9:55 am |
|
 |
Buckmark311
MMT Pro Member
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2015 11:50 am Posts: 284
|
 Re: 1848 vs 1754
I vote for the 1754 ONLY because you will be doing more bowfishing than ducking. If you were just looking to duck, id say the 1848 because you will probably be able to be a little faster to your hole. But when you are bowfishing you will be slow trolling and dealing with chop and waves while fishing. The extra 6" will help to keep you stable. Consider a removable flush deck to help with stability as well as 22-24" sides to keep enough freeboard when you have the boat loaded down with 1K pounds of fish.
|
Tue Jan 17, 2017 10:55 am |
|
 |
b.latiolais
MMT Pro Member
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2014 3:06 pm Posts: 314 Location: Bridge City
|
 Re: 1848 vs 1754
Why not a 1854?
|
Tue Jan 17, 2017 11:17 am |
|
 |
Roostertail3
MMT Pro Member
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 10:32 am Posts: 334 Location: Middle ga
|
 Re: 1848 vs 1754
Why not a 1851, sturdier than a 1844 and more room that a 1754.
|
Tue Jan 17, 2017 2:58 pm |
|
 |
brycecheramie
MMT 1000 Club
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 7:38 am Posts: 4323 Location: Cut Off, La.
|
 Re: 1848 vs 1754
I would go with 18x54 and a modded motor. But then again, I think if you post this post again with the poll in another section you might even get more answers! 
_________________ Refurbishing a Prodrive
|
Tue Jan 17, 2017 2:59 pm |
|
 |
Bug
MMT 1000 Club
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 10:28 am Posts: 1068 Location: Tallahassee, Fl
|
 Re: 1848 vs 1754
Neither one, you need two boats
_________________ PRODRIVE 1860 CC "Let the good times roll" Luck??? The bassards don't stand a chance!
|
Wed Jan 18, 2017 7:52 pm |
|
 |
CypressCritter
MMT F.E.
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 10:36 am Posts: 822 Location: Jefferson TX
|
 Re: 1848 vs 1754
_________________ SEAARK FX 2472 CC Merc 150HP 4Stroke(CypressCadillac) Uncle J Custom - 19x54 CC Skiff w/40XD GTR
|
Tue Jan 24, 2017 8:58 am |
|
 |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 8 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 488 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|