| MudmotorTalk.com http://mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/ |
|
| Double barrel vs double barrel X? http://mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=26375 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Missourimudrunner [ Sat Feb 04, 2012 7:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
What's you opnion between the two. I love the sound of the x but I have no mods on my motor and the only mod I may ever do is the cam. Is getting a double barrel x going to be bad for a motor with no mods? Or should I just stick with the double barrel or even the bps q |
|
| Author: | med [ Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
Id get the q. Fork a loud motor. |
|
| Author: | Missourimudrunner [ Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
Fork a loud motor? I'm not sure I understand |
|
| Author: | 4Cody4 [ Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
Med can't figure out why you would want your motor to be loud, and I'm with him. These things are already loud, no sense in makin yourself deaf runnin down river. However, I'm sure there are plenty of people here who have dual exhaust on their pickup trucks who will disagree with me.  Sent using my bag phone |
|
| Author: | Missourimudrunner [ Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
So go with the Q? I just saw ppl complaining about the quality of them thats why I leaned away from them |
|
| Author: | Barroll [ Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
| Author: | take'emgator [ Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
I had the double barrel X and loved it, would still have it if it weren't for the mods i have. I had it without baffles and i never got tired of the sound. Its just alittle bit louder than stock IMO. We put one on a motor last night for a customer and it had baffles and it had a real nice sound to it, sounded real nice. |
|
| Author: | med [ Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
Lol..don't go by what I say. I used to have a 31 mb and had a bps pipe that sounded good. But it was loud and when huntn season rolled around I took it off. Now since they make a good exhaust that's on the quiter side I know what I will be buying in the future. I use my rig mainly for hunting and a loud boat just don't appeal to me. Listening to all the loud ass mm's run around on the lake this past season made me realuze I don't want one. |
|
| Author: | Missourimudrunner [ Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
So I'm thinking the double barrel x with baffles sounds good and queiter with baffles. But with no mods I was makeing sure it would be ok or just overkill |
|
| Author: | take'emgator [ Sat Feb 04, 2012 11:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
You'll be jsut fine, if anything it'll run better. You'll really like the sound |
|
| Author: | Missourimudrunner [ Sat Feb 04, 2012 11:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
Great then I'll prolly go with the double barrel x |
|
| Author: | 50fps [ Sat Feb 04, 2012 4:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
| Author: | Missourimudrunner [ Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
Your right I reread reviews and it was the crossover. So the Q is pretty well made and sounds good? |
|
| Author: | 50fps [ Sat Feb 04, 2012 6:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
| Author: | Missourimudrunner [ Sat Feb 04, 2012 6:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
Great, I like the q for hunting and it's 100 bucks cheaper. Prolly go with that |
|
| Author: | robertb4wd [ Sat Feb 04, 2012 7:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
I've been pleased with my Marshmellow. I've got one of the single outlets with no baffles. It's not much louder than stock, but has a great tone. |
|
| Author: | WestEndAngler [ Sat Feb 04, 2012 7:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
I have the dual outlet no baffles. It lets my motor breathe like it should. Great tone. |
|
| Author: | Missourimudrunner [ Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
Those mm do sound amazing. I still may go with double barrel x |
|
| Author: | Skipr [ Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
I have the dual outlet with the baffles. It's not much loader than stock (if at all) but has a lower tone to it. I really like the way it sounds. |
|
| Author: | Wilson [ Sun Feb 05, 2012 5:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
| Author: | take'emgator [ Sun Feb 05, 2012 12:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
He had single outlet without the cam and mods, after he did the mods he upgraded for better flow with all the performance stuff! |
|
| Author: | TDUET [ Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Double barrel vs double barrel X? |
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|