Nice video. That guy needs an o shit handle
| MudmotorTalk.com http://mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/ |
|
| Ppf versus backwater http://mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=70375 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | woody [ Fri May 05, 2017 4:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Ppf versus backwater |
I know this has been discussed. But I was wondering if the glider kit with an 8 hp predator will be much different than the ppf the Briggs. Thinks the Briggs is a 6.5 with 8 lb torque and the 8 predator had 12 or 14 lbs torque. Going on an ebads. Thanks |
|
| Author: | flint87 [ Fri May 05, 2017 4:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ppf versus backwater |
Nobody here knows shit about a kit engine and everyone is going to say backwater. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
| Author: | woody [ Fri May 05, 2017 5:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ppf versus backwater |
well that helps. Thanks |
|
| Author: | FRANKtheTAU [ Fri May 05, 2017 7:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ppf versus backwater |
Depending on the size of the EBADS, a 13hp Predator on a SWOMP Lite frame would be hard to beat. Carson Keitt runs the same set up on a 1436 riveted boat and that little rig is impressive. Below is a link to one of his videos but look at his channel because he has several. I have had my SWOMP Lite for 3 years and have loved it. No issues or complaints. https://youtu.be/rWsCqsjQ5TA |
|
| Author: | 45th parallel [ Sat May 06, 2017 6:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ppf versus backwater |
The difference in vibration and ease with which a Backwater drives will make a very noticeable difference, especially on smaller hulls and sneak boats. I had a PPF for a couple of years and stopped at Backwater to get a new prop for it. They had a swomp lite with an identical motor on a similar hull sitting in the lake behind their shop. They asked if I'd like to try it out. I placed my order and sold the PPF, couldn't believe the difference in how they ran. A side note- we weighed both motors that day as I was still hung up on weight , and guess what, both rigs fully complet with props, oil and full gas tanks as you'd use them were less than ten pounds apart. |
|
| Author: | woody [ Wed May 10, 2017 7:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ppf versus backwater |
Thanks for the help |
|
| Author: | Will C [ Wed May 10, 2017 8:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ppf versus backwater |
Nice video. That guy needs an o shit handle
|
|
| Author: | 50fps [ Wed May 10, 2017 8:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ppf versus backwater |
Stump-jumper iffn you want to save some dime. |
|
| Author: | Glades Ranger [ Thu May 11, 2017 6:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ppf versus backwater |
I started off with a 1436 leaky riveted jon with a 25 'Rude that flew, quickly morphed to an 18 HP GD LT and I love it and was lucky not to have sunk it....still wish I had the hull because it was so easy to move around, hide, and would love to try it again with a small HP LT. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|