It is currently Tue Mar 17, 2026 5:35 am




Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
 1642 or 1644 
Author Message
MMT Member

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:23 am
Posts: 4
Post 1642 or 1644
Looking at getting an alweld. Having trouble deciding on a 1642 or a 1644. The area I hunt has a 25hp or less motor restriction so I'm putting a 23hp LT or SD on the back of it. Is there really any noticeable difference in the 2" of width?


Thu Jan 12, 2017 5:30 pm
Profile
MMT 1000 Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 10:30 pm
Posts: 1386
Location: West TN
Post Re: 1642 or 1644
What kind of terrain are you going to run? What's your typical load? Are you leaning long tail or surface drive?

_________________
40 Backwater SWOMP Lite / 1752 Alweld Mud

6.5 Backwater SWOMP Lite / 1440 PolarKraft


Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:25 pm
Profile
MMT Member

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:23 am
Posts: 4
Post Re: 1642 or 1644
Running the marshes and waterfowl management areas of SE GA.....not really running mud but shallow water and places where my outboard won't take me. Leaning towards a Copperhead, but a 23hp Backwater is more my budget. Heaviest load I'll run is 2 guys, a cooler, 2dz decoys, and the rest of our duck hunting gear.


Thu Jan 12, 2017 8:10 pm
Profile
MMT 1000 Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 10:30 pm
Posts: 1386
Location: West TN
Post Re: 1642 or 1644
If it'll usually be you, another guy, and gear...I'd run a 1644. If it was going to be you and gear, I'd be happy with a 1642. I'll think you'll have an easier time finding a 1644. My 2 cents.

_________________
40 Backwater SWOMP Lite / 1752 Alweld Mud

6.5 Backwater SWOMP Lite / 1440 PolarKraft


Thu Jan 12, 2017 8:21 pm
Profile
MMT Member

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:23 am
Posts: 4
Post Re: 1642 or 1644
So you think either of those motors would be enough to push a 1644 with the load? I'm not so much worried about the SD doing it but rather the LT. I kinda like the idea of speed but like the rugged simplicity of a LT (fewer moving parts = less that can go wrong).


Thu Jan 12, 2017 8:27 pm
Profile
MMT 1000 Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 10:30 pm
Posts: 1386
Location: West TN
Post Re: 1642 or 1644
I am 100% sure that 23 SWOMP Lite would a 1644 on pad with 2 guys and gear. Follow Backwater on Facebook. They have a tour going on right now. They're are traveling across the country with a 1644 Alweld and a 23 SWOMP Lite. They are meeting up with customers and those who are interested in Backwater motors. Depending on what part of the country you're in they'll be in your area soon if you haven't missed them. I believe they're still in Texas right now.

_________________
40 Backwater SWOMP Lite / 1752 Alweld Mud

6.5 Backwater SWOMP Lite / 1440 PolarKraft


Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:05 pm
Profile
MMT 1000 Club

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 2:21 pm
Posts: 3214
Post Re: 1642 or 1644


Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:34 am
Profile
MMT Addict
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 1:38 am
Posts: 606
Location: Beaumont, Texas
Post Re: 1642 or 1644
I had a Backwater SWOMP with a 23HP Predator on a 14x42 Alweld. The hull was light, but I had a HEAVY 2 man hunt load in it. With the load is would run 17-19. Empty 22-24. This was with a 9x7 prop.

The predator was a really impressive motor. It would have undoubtedly ran better on a slightly longer boat.

_________________
Uncle J - 17 x 48 w/GTR | Bayou Surface Drive heads | Voodoo exhaust | DIY Mikuni carb


Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:42 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 8 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to: