|
|
FAQ
• Login
|
|
It is currently Tue Mar 17, 2026 5:35 am
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 8 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
mad_maximus
MMT Member
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:23 am Posts: 4
|
 1642 or 1644
Looking at getting an alweld. Having trouble deciding on a 1642 or a 1644. The area I hunt has a 25hp or less motor restriction so I'm putting a 23hp LT or SD on the back of it. Is there really any noticeable difference in the 2" of width?
|
| Thu Jan 12, 2017 5:30 pm |
|
 |
|
FRANKtheTAU
MMT 1000 Club
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 10:30 pm Posts: 1386 Location: West TN
|
 Re: 1642 or 1644
What kind of terrain are you going to run? What's your typical load? Are you leaning long tail or surface drive?
_________________ 40 Backwater SWOMP Lite / 1752 Alweld Mud
6.5 Backwater SWOMP Lite / 1440 PolarKraft
|
| Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:25 pm |
|
 |
|
mad_maximus
MMT Member
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:23 am Posts: 4
|
 Re: 1642 or 1644
Running the marshes and waterfowl management areas of SE GA.....not really running mud but shallow water and places where my outboard won't take me. Leaning towards a Copperhead, but a 23hp Backwater is more my budget. Heaviest load I'll run is 2 guys, a cooler, 2dz decoys, and the rest of our duck hunting gear.
|
| Thu Jan 12, 2017 8:10 pm |
|
 |
|
FRANKtheTAU
MMT 1000 Club
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 10:30 pm Posts: 1386 Location: West TN
|
 Re: 1642 or 1644
If it'll usually be you, another guy, and gear...I'd run a 1644. If it was going to be you and gear, I'd be happy with a 1642. I'll think you'll have an easier time finding a 1644. My 2 cents.
_________________ 40 Backwater SWOMP Lite / 1752 Alweld Mud
6.5 Backwater SWOMP Lite / 1440 PolarKraft
|
| Thu Jan 12, 2017 8:21 pm |
|
 |
|
mad_maximus
MMT Member
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:23 am Posts: 4
|
 Re: 1642 or 1644
So you think either of those motors would be enough to push a 1644 with the load? I'm not so much worried about the SD doing it but rather the LT. I kinda like the idea of speed but like the rugged simplicity of a LT (fewer moving parts = less that can go wrong).
|
| Thu Jan 12, 2017 8:27 pm |
|
 |
|
FRANKtheTAU
MMT 1000 Club
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 10:30 pm Posts: 1386 Location: West TN
|
 Re: 1642 or 1644
I am 100% sure that 23 SWOMP Lite would a 1644 on pad with 2 guys and gear. Follow Backwater on Facebook. They have a tour going on right now. They're are traveling across the country with a 1644 Alweld and a 23 SWOMP Lite. They are meeting up with customers and those who are interested in Backwater motors. Depending on what part of the country you're in they'll be in your area soon if you haven't missed them. I believe they're still in Texas right now.
_________________ 40 Backwater SWOMP Lite / 1752 Alweld Mud
6.5 Backwater SWOMP Lite / 1440 PolarKraft
|
| Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:05 pm |
|
 |
|
flint87
MMT 1000 Club
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 2:21 pm Posts: 3214
|
 Re: 1642 or 1644
|
| Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:34 am |
|
 |
|
reharbert
MMT Addict
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 1:38 am Posts: 606 Location: Beaumont, Texas
|
 Re: 1642 or 1644
I had a Backwater SWOMP with a 23HP Predator on a 14x42 Alweld. The hull was light, but I had a HEAVY 2 man hunt load in it. With the load is would run 17-19. Empty 22-24. This was with a 9x7 prop.
The predator was a really impressive motor. It would have undoubtedly ran better on a slightly longer boat.
_________________ Uncle J - 17 x 48 w/GTR | Bayou Surface Drive heads | Voodoo exhaust | DIY Mikuni carb
|
| Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:42 am |
|
 |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 8 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|